% beamerstructure2 presentation \documentclass{beamer} \usetheme{Warsaw} \setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{} \title{Sectionally complemented chopped lattices} \author{George Gr\"atzer\inst{1} \and Harry Lakser\inst{1} \and Michael Roddy\inst{2}} \institute{\inst{1} University of Manitoba \and \inst{2} Brandon University} \date{Conference on Lattice Theory, 2006} %Note that multiple authors are separated by \verb+\and+ and so are %the various institutions. The \verb+\date+ command is treated as a %footnote. \begin{document} \begin{frame} \titlepage \end{frame} %To show an outline of the whole presentation, we have to fake it. %The command \verb+\tableofcontents+ provides you with the Table of %Contents of the whole presentation only if there are no parts. %With an optional argument, it can also provide the Table of Contents %of a specific part: \verb+\tableofcontents[part=3]+ is the %Table of Contents of Part 3. We also use the \ttt{pausesections} %option. %The Table of Contents of the whole presentation is given in an %unnumbered section and three unnumbered subsections. \section*{Outline} \subsection*{Part I: Background} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Outline of Part I: Background} \tableofcontents [part=1,pausesections] \end{frame} \subsection*{Part II: Characterizing the 1960 sectional complement} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Outline of Part II: Characterizing the\\1960 sectional complement} \tableofcontents[part=2,pausesections] \end{frame} \subsection*{Part III: The general problem} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Outline of Part III: The general problem} \tableofcontents[part=3,pausesections] \end{frame} %Now come the three parts. Each part is introduced with two frames: %the first with \verb+\partpage+ (which is the ``titlepage'' for the %part) and the second with the command \verb+\tableofcontents+ %(for the part). %We provide each section with a frame to activate it. \part{Background} \begin{frame} \partpage \end{frame} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Part I\\Outline} \tableofcontents \end{frame} \section{Chopped lattices} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Defining chopped lattices} Starting the definitions \end{frame} \section{Ideals and congruences} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Ideals} Continuing the definitions \end{frame} \part{Characterizing the 1960 sectional complement} \begin{frame} \partpage \end{frame} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Part II\\Outline} \tableofcontents \end{frame} \section{What it is not} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Not maximal, minimal, or fixed point} Counterexamples \end{frame} \section{The characterization theorem} \begin{frame} \frametitle{The main result} State the characterization theorem \end{frame} \part{The general problem} \begin{frame} \partpage \end{frame} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Part III\\Outline} \tableofcontents \end{frame} \section{The Lakser Theorem} \begin{frame} \frametitle{The problem} Stating the general problem and Harry's observation \end{frame} \section{A small counterexample} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Four-element overlap} Counterexample \end{frame} \section{A cyclic counterexample} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Three cycle} Cyclic counterexample \end{frame} \end{document}