A single categorical variable

Gender

Plot

Table
Gender n p
female 40 40%
male 60 59%
diverse 1 1%
Total 101 100%
Missing 0

A cross table

Innovator type

Plot

Table
Gender Total I try new offers immediately I try new offers rather quickly I wait until offers establish themselves I only use new offers when I have no other choice
female 100%
(40)
5%
(2)
62%
(25)
32%
(13)
0%
(0)
male 100%
(60)
20%
(12)
63%
(38)
15%
(9)
2%
(1)
diverse 100%
(1)
100%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
Total 100%
(101)
15%
(15)
62%
(63)
22%
(22)
1%
(1)

Automatic index calculation

Expectations

Plot

Table
Expectations strongly disagree disagree neutral agree strongly agree Total
ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. 6% (6) 8% (8) 35% (34) 36% (35) 14% (14) 100% (97)
Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. 22% (21) 22% (21) 30% (29) 21% (20) 6% (6) 100% (97)
Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. 6% (6) 10% (10) 21% (20) 46% (45) 16% (16) 100% (97)
Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. 6% (6) 4% (4) 36% (35) 39% (38) 14% (14) 100% (97)
Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. 6% (6) 27% (26) 32% (31) 22% (21) 13% (13) 100% (97)
There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. 10% (10) 19% (18) 41% (40) 14% (14) 15% (15) 100% (97)
The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. 3% (3) 22% (21) 42% (41) 19% (18) 14% (14) 100% (97)
Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. 11% (11) 35% (34) 29% (28) 18% (17) 7% (7) 100% (97)
In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. 20% (19) 34% (33) 26% (25) 15% (15) 5% (5) 100% (97)
Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. 27% (26) 31% (30) 26% (25) 10% (10) 6% (6) 100% (97)
Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. 46% (45) 27% (26) 14% (14) 7% (7) 5% (5) 100% (97)
Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. 33% (32) 27% (26) 21% (20) 13% (13) 6% (6) 100% (97)
Index: Plot

Index: Table
Index: cg_adoption value
min 1
q1 2.5
median 2.8
q3 3.2
max 5
m 2.9
sd 0.6
missing 0
n 101
items 12
alpha 0.81

Group comparisons of an index

Expectations

Plot

Table
Expectations Total female male diverse
ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. 3.4
(1.0)
3.6
(1.0)
3.3
(1.0)
4.0
(NA)
Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. 2.7
(1.2)
2.6
(1.2)
2.7
(1.2)
3.0
(NA)
Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. 3.6
(1.1)
3.7
(1.0)
3.5
(1.1)
4.0
(NA)
Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. 3.5
(1.0)
3.6
(1.0)
3.5
(1.0)
3.0
(NA)
Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. 3.1
(1.1)
3.1
(1.0)
3.1
(1.2)
3.0
(NA)
There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. 3.1
(1.2)
3.0
(1.0)
3.1
(1.3)
3.0
(NA)
The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. 3.2
(1.0)
3.0
(1.0)
3.3
(1.1)
3.0
(NA)
Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. 2.7
(1.1)
2.5
(0.9)
2.8
(1.2)
4.0
(NA)
In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. 2.5
(1.1)
2.5
(0.9)
2.5
(1.3)
4.0
(NA)
Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. 2.4
(1.2)
2.4
(1.0)
2.3
(1.3)
4.0
(NA)
Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. 2.0
(1.2)
1.8
(1.0)
2.1
(1.3)
4.0
(NA)
Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. 2.3
(1.2)
2.4
(1.2)
2.3
(1.3)
3.0
(NA)
Index: Plot

Index: Table
Gender min q1 median q3 max m sd missing n items alpha
female 2.0 2.5 2.9 3.1 3.8 2.9 0.4 0 40 12 0.81
male 1.0 2.5 2.8 3.2 5.0 2.9 0.7 0 60 12 0.81
diverse 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 NA 0 1 12 0.81
Total 1.0 2.5 2.8 3.2 5.0 2.9 0.6 0 101 12 0.81

Mixed content

Adoption types

Plot

Table
Gender Total I try new offers immediately I try new offers rather quickly I wait until offers establish themselves I only use new offers when I have no other choice
female 100%
(40)
5%
(2)
62%
(25)
32%
(13)
0%
(0)
male 100%
(60)
20%
(12)
63%
(38)
15%
(9)
2%
(1)
diverse 100%
(1)
100%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
Total 100%
(101)
15%
(15)
62%
(63)
22%
(22)
1%
(1)
Method

Basis: Only male and female respondents.