This package plots a PRISMA flow chart describing the identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion or studies in systematic reviews. PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PRISMA focuses on the reporting of reviews evaluating randomized trials, but can also be used as a basis for reporting systematic reviews of other types of research, particularly evaluations of interventions. (Moher et al. 2009)
For publication quality graphics, a certain number of DPI is often requested. This is difficult to achieve with the chain of tools that PRISMAstatement uses (DiagrammeR, htmlwidgets), and also affected by the output container which may be a PDF vignette, file, browser window, etc..
prisma(found = 750,
found_other = 123,
no_dupes = 776,
screened = 776,
screen_exclusions = 13,
full_text = 763,
full_text_exclusions = 17,
qualitative = 746,
quantitative = 319,
width = 200, height = 200)
just set width and height
prisma(found = 750,
found_other = 123,
no_dupes = 776,
screened = 776,
screen_exclusions = 13,
full_text = 763,
full_text_exclusions = 17,
qualitative = 746,
quantitative = 319,
width = 200, height = 200,
dpi = 300)
same width and height but DPI increased to 300
prisma(found = 750,
found_other = 123,
no_dupes = 776,
screened = 776,
screen_exclusions = 13,
full_text = 763,
full_text_exclusions = 17,
qualitative = 746,
quantitative = 319,
width = 200, height = 200,
dpi = 36)
same width and height but DPI decreased to 36
My recommendation is to leave DPI at the default (72), and change the canvas size to achieve the correct number of pixels to fit the width of your target document. Tweaking the DPI may help (or cause) clipping.
Moher, David, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLOS Med 6 (7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.